Category: illness

Posted on

Loren Lockman on the body's reaction to eating cooked food

Gourmet Meals

In this video, Loren Lockman of the Tanglewood Wellness Center answers the question “what happens to the human body on eating cooked food?”

Does eating cooked food affect the body’s temperature?

It does. Normal body temperature is 98.6 Fahrenheight or 37 Celsius. But normal means, not healthy, but average. Is this the healthy temperature?
Not necessarily.

Every time that you put cooked food in your body, your body says “something is wrong” and there is an immune response.

This was proven in an experiment about 80 years ago, where the same group of people were fed at different times both raw and cooked food. The result was that, each time a person ate cooked foods, the scientists observed the condition known as leucocytosis, the process by which the body sends white blood cells to the site of an injury.

Prior to this study, scientists were not aware that this process occured during digestion, so a new term was coined: “digestive leucocytosis”. But this condition did NOT occur when the same people ate raw food.

In a later study, scientists in Sweden showed that when we cook anything, we create acrylamide, a known carcinogen. The scientists were actually trying to understand why people that work with this chemical did not have any increased propensity to cancer. The researchers found that the reason for the lack of increased risk is due to the fact that nearly everyone exposes themselves to this chemical on a daily basis!

If you are consuming cooked carbohydrates, you are consuming (according to the U.S. goverment) up to 100 times the “safe” quantity of acrylamide.

Although the government claims that there is in fact a “safe” amount of a toxic carcinogen, Loren and I beg to differ: there is no safe quantity.

Loren asks “might this be the reason that cancer has been growing so rapidly?… Well [the constant exposure to carcinogens] certainly plays a major role”.

Every time you eat cooked food, your intelligent body says “oh this is toxic!”, and responds as though it has been poisoned… but only because it has!

To contact Loren, please visit www.tanglewoodwellnesscenter.com

Posted on

FDA to ban trans fats, will prevent more than 7,000 deaths per year

The FDA, often criticized for allowing toxic substances to be sold as food, is taking a major step toward preventing disease. Hydrogenated oils, also known as trans fats, will no longer be “Generally Recognized As Safe” or GRAS for short.

This means that manufacturers will no longer be allowed to sell them without first producing scientific proof that they are safe. And frankly, no one could prove such a thing, without resorting to fuzzy math, trickery, deceit and outright corruption.

In 2006, the New England Journal of Medicine published a review article entitle “Trans Fats and Cardiovascular Disease” wherein that the authors cautioned against even conducting a long-term trial, saying that it would be “unethical, given the adverse effects of trans fats on serum lipid levels and inflammation”.

Using hydrogenated oil instead of healthy oil helps the bottom line of the manufacturer by increasing the shelf life and lowering the cost of its products, but they are terrible for your body. Several studies have implicated trans fats in a variety of conditions like heart disease, cancer, obesity, diabetes, ADHD and Alzheimer’s.

Trans Fat cause Heart Disease

The World Health Organization reports that heart disease is the leading cause of death worldwide.

According to Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian and others, in the April 16, 2006 edition of the New England Journal of Medicine:

“On a per-calorie basis, trans fats appear to increase the risk of Coronary Heart Disease more than any other macronutrient, conferring a substantially increased risk at low levels of consumption… In an analysis of nearly 140,000 subjects, a 2 percent increase in energy intake from trans fatty acids was associated with a 23 percent increase in the incidence of Coronary Heart Disease.

Prior to 2006, the FDA did not require manufacturers to disclose the inclusion of trans fats on labels of their packaged goods. Americans were consuming a large daily dose of a deadly toxin without so much as a tiny warning on the label. Since the FDA began requiring that trans fats be labeled, the food industry has dramatically reduced the amount of trans fats used in its products. According to the FDA, Americans consumed about 4.6 grams of trans fats per day in 2003 compared to about 1 gram per day in 2012.

Unfortunately, many products still contain these dangerous semi-solid oils and often people don’t read the labels, and some may not understand the dangers of trans fats.

If the FDA’s current motion is successful in effectively banning trans fats from manufactured foods, Americans are likely to suffer 20,000 fewer heart attacks per year, and about 7,000 untimely deaths from heart attacks will be prevented.  This measure, which is  long overdue, sadly won’t come into effect immediately.

The FDA made its decision to require trans fats to be labeled in 2003, but that measure did not come into effect until 2006.

Although I do applaud the FDA for eventually making the right moves on this particular toxin, one simply cannot afford to rely on the FDA for food safety in the predictable near future. When you go to the supermarket, it would be wise to bring a magnifying glass to help you scrutinize every item that you will feed to your family.  For the next undetermined time you must be on the lookout for trans fats under all its criminal aliases, including “partially-hydrogenated vegetable oil” , “margarine” and “shortening”.

Posted on

GMO’s hidden in your food linked with cancer, migraines, sterility, diabetes, autism and digestive disordersOGM vinculados al cáncer, las migrañas, la esterilidad, la diabetes, el autismo y los trastornos digestivos

GMO stands for Genetically Modified Organism. In essence, mad scientists extract parts of a gene from one species and force it onto another species. The short term effect is a new, patentable gene that has a disgusting safety record.

But safety has nothing to do with GMO, whose only goal is to produce profits for the patent-holder. GMO’s do not offer a single benefit to the consumer. They do not taste better, or offer any additional nutrient value. The manufacturer does promise a benefit to farmers, but fails to deliver on that promise.

What is the promise to farmers?

Farmers erroneously believe they will receive higher yields  with the GMO crops. In reality, the yields are higher with organic, sustainable crops, which are more resistant to drought. Therefore the only “benefit” to the farmer is a more expensive seed that is “roundup-ready”, meaning that they can spray copious amounts of Glyphosate (a chemical weapon of war) on their food crops. Everything will die except for zombified plants that look like food.

What happens to Animals fed GMO’s?

Animals often instinctively avoid the GMO’s. Researchers have been repeatedly shocked at seeing the animals’ refusal to eat the GMO food that looks identical to the organic version. When they are forced to eat GMO’s, they often develop grotesque tumours, have stillborn babies, or are rendered infertile. The effect is passed down to future generations. When an animal is fed GMO’s, her offspring will typically be smaller, may die suddenly within the first week, or will likely be infertile. Instead of a perpetual cycle of producing new generations forever, the way God intended, the GMO-fed animals usually extinguish themselves within just three generations.

What about Human Trials?

Well that is kind of a trick question, since there have been none! Yes, that’s right. Some lawmakers thought that it would be a good idea to skip the human trials and proceed to allow the Evil Monsanto to release its animal-disfiguring and toxic GMO’s directly to the market so that YOU (yes, YOU) can be the guinea pig!

OH MY GOD! Are you serious?

Unfortunately, yes.  The unwitting human test-subjects are already showing a plethora of horrible symptoms, most commonly headaches including migraines, inflammation (everywhere) and every kind of digestive disorder, plus food allergies. Also, most long-term disorders including diabetes and autism have steadily increased since the release of GMO’s just a few years ago. The full extent of the damage is still unknown, because diseases like cancer often take many years to develop. In about 5-10 more years, if GMO’s are still around, there may be a huge amount of evidence proving that GMO’s are directly related to cancer.

But you’ll have to wait about 70 more years to find out if your grand-kids are able to continue the family-tradition of making babies. One of the main reasons that scientists use animals for scientific study is precisely this: most animals have a much shorter lifespan than we do. We can therefore see the “long-term” effects of a substance much faster than if we wait for three human generations. Certainly, there are some cases where a substance is harmful to an animal yet harmless to humans and vice versa. That’s why we (normally) have three phases of study before allowing a substance into the market:

Phase one: test tubes! If it looks harmful in a test tube, then we probably shouldn’t feed it to an animal!

Phase two: animals! If it looks to be beneficial in the test tubes, let’s test it on a sick animal, and see if it cures them! But if we give it to a healthy animal and the animal dies or becomes seriously ill, then we definitely shouldn’t be giving this to humans.

Phase three: humans! If a substance has been shown to cure sick animals, there may be some humans willing to try their luck. This is usually done with the full consent of the patient, who is required to read a long list of possible side effects, then sign a waiver of responsibility… in case the experiment is unsuccessful.

It’s deplorable that the government has allowed good, honest, non-consenting individuals to become part of this sick experiment. I did not sign any consent form. Did you? I thought not. And yet these GMO’s are now so ubiquitous that they are hard to avoid. Nearly the entire supermarket is filled with them. They are most likely in your fridge and in your gut. Sadly, you’ve probably fed these same poisons to your children, believing them to be safe, at least as safe as other processed food.

So what can I do?

Opt out of the experiment immediately! If you live in a country that has a modicum of respect for human life, the GMO’s will either be completely banned or at least properly labeled. If you live in the USA or Canada, whose governments claim to protect life but so far have not followed through on that promise, you’ll have to assume that GMO’s are in just about every package of processed food. In particular, you should stay away from ALL non-organic products containing corn, soy and canola.

I am sure that you love your family as much as I love mine. If so, then you will want to inform each and every member of your family (and there is no need to stop there) about the looming dangers of GMO. You may want to send them this article, or buy a copy of the documentary above. You may also want to help your family clean out its fridges and pantries. If it seems like “wasting money” to throw away food, remember these two points:

First, illness ALWAYS costs more than wellness!

And second, GMO’s are NOT food!!!!!!!!!!! http://youtu.be/HUQWG4-vq90

 

OGM significa Organismo Genéticamente Modificado. En esencia, unos científicos-locos extraen partes de un gen de una especie y la meten a la fuerza al gen de otra especie. El efecto a corto plazo es un nuevo gen “patentable” con un historial de seguridad repugnante. Pero la seguridad no tiene nada que ver con los OGM, cuyo único objetivo es producir ganancias para el titular de la patente. OGM no ofrecen una ventaja para el consumidor. Ellos no saben mejor, ni ofrecen algún valor nutricional adicional. El fabricante promete un beneficio para los agricultores, pero tampoco logra cumplir tal promesa.

¿Cuál es la promesa de los agricultores?

Los agricultores creen erróneamente que recibirán mayores rendimientos con los cultivos transgénicos. En realidad, los rendimientos son más altos con los cultivos orgánicos-sostenibles, que son más resistentes a la sequía. Por lo tanto, el único “beneficio” para el agricultor es una semilla más caro que es “roundup-ready” (listo para el veneno Roundup), lo que significa que puede rociar grandes cantidades de glifosato (un arma química de guerra) en sus cultivos de alimentos. Todo alrededor morirá, con la excepción de las plantas zombis que se parecen a los alimentos.

¿Qué sucede con los animales alimentados con transgénicos?

Los animales a menudo instintivamente evitan el OGM. Los investigadores frecuentemente se sorprenden al observar la forma que los animales niegan a comer los alimentos OGM que, a simple vista humana, parecen idénticos a la versión orgánica. Cuando se ven obligados a comer los OGM, los pobres animales a menudo desarrollan tumores grotescos, tienen bebés nacidos muertos, o se vuelven estéril. Tristemente, el efecto se transmite a las futuras generaciones. Cuando un animal es alimentado de OGM, típicamente sus hijos serán más pequeños, pueden morir repentinamente durante la primera semana, y los que sobreviven son estériles. En vez del ciclo perpetuo de la reproducción según el plan-maestro de Dios, los animales alimentados con OGM suelen extinguirse en sólo tres generaciones.

¿Qué hay de ensayos con humanos?

No ha habido ninguno! Sí, es cierto. Algunos legisladores pensaron que sería una buena idea para saltar las pruebas en humanos y permitir al Malisimo Monsanto de liberar sus OGM’s tóxicos directamente al mercado para que usted (sí, usted) se convierta en conejillo de indias!

DIOS MIO! ¿Es en serio?

Por desgracia, sí. Los seres humanas sujetos involuntariamente a la “prueba” ya están mostrando una plétora de síntomas horribles, más comúnmente dolores de cabeza, incluyendo las migrañas, la inflamación (por todas partes) y cada tipo de trastorno digestivo, además de alergias a los alimentos y mucho mas. La mayoría de los trastornos crónicos como la diabetes y el autismo han aumentado de manera constante desde el lanzamiento de los transgénicos hace apenas unos años. El alcance total de los daños aún se desconoce, ya que las enfermedades como el cáncer a menudo tardan años en desarrollarse. En unos 5-10 años más, si los transgénicos todavía abundan, puede haber una gran cantidad de pruebas de que los transgénicos están directamente relacionados con el cáncer.

Pero usted tendrá que esperar unos 70 años más para ver si sus nietos son capaces de continuar la tradición familiar de la procreación. Una de las razones principales que los científicos usan animales para el estudio científico es precisamente esto: la mayoría de los animales tienen una vida mucho más corta de la nuestra. Por tanto, podemos ver los efectos “a largo plazo” de una sustancia mucho más rápido que si esperamos a tres generaciones humanas. Ciertamente, hay algunos casos en los que una sustancia es perjudicial para el animal pero inofensivos para los humanos y viceversa. Es por eso que (normalmente) se requiere de tres fases de estudio antes de soltar una sustancia en el mercado:

Fase uno: tubos de ensayo! Si la sustancia parece perjudicial en esta fase, es preferible no dársela ni a los animales!

Fase dos: los animales! Si la sustancia parece ser beneficiosa en la primera fase, se proceda a probarla en animales enfermos, con la esperanza de que se curen! Pero si le damos a un animal sano y el animal muere o resulta gravemente enfermo, entonces definitivamente no deberíamos dar esto a los seres humanos.

Fase tres: los seres humanos! Si se ha demostrado que una sustancia cura a los animales enfermos, puede haber algunas personas dispuestas a probar su suerte. Esto se hace con el pleno consentimiento del paciente, que está obligado a leer una larga lista de posibles efectos secundarios, y luego firmar una renuncia de la responsabilidad… en caso de que el experimento no tenga éxito.

Es deplorable que el gobierno ha permitido que la gente buena, honesta, sin consentimiento, forman parte de este experimento absurdo. Yo no firmé ningún formulario. ¿Y usted? Tampoco. Mas sin embargo, estos OGM son ahora tan omnipresente que son difíciles de evitar. Casi todo el supermercado se llena con ellos. Probablemente existen en su nevera y en su intestino. Lamentablemente, usted probablemente ha alimentado a sus hijos con estos mismos venenos, considerando que eran seguros, por lo menos tan seguro como los demás alimentos procesados.

Entonces, ¿qué puedo hacer?

Darse de bajo del experimento de forma inmediata! Si usted vive en un país donde el gobierno tiene un mínimo de respeto por la vida humana, el OGM o será totalmente prohibido o por lo menos adecuadamente etiquetados. Si usted vive en los EE.UU. o Canadá , cuyos gobiernos pretenden proteger la vida, pero hasta ahora no han cumplido con esa promesa, tendrá que asumir que los transgénicos son en casi todos los paquetes de alimentos procesados​​. En particular, usted debe permanecer lejos de todos los productos no-orgánicos que contienen maíz, soya y canola.

Estoy seguro de que usted ama a su familia tanto como amo la mía. Si es así, entonces informa a cada uno de los miembros de su familia (y desde allí puede seguir informando la demás gente) sobre los peligros inminentes de OMG. Es posible que desee enviar este artículo, o comprar una copia del documental anterior. También puede ayudar a su familia a limpiar sus refrigeradores y botar a los OGM venenosos. Si le parece “una pérdida de dinero” tirar la comida, recuerde bien estos dos puntos:

Primero, la enfermedad siempre cuesta más que el bienestar!

Y segundo, los transgénicos no son comida!!!!!

Posted on

Dr. Woodcock and the FDA's Attempt to Curb Drug Abuse

It’s practically a thankless job. Worse than that, the good people at the United States Food and Drug Administration are frequently under pressure from all sides of many a heated debate. Patent holders want to sell more drugs and prefer that the FDA make all plants illegal. Well-intentioned promoters of natural health like Dr. Mercola and others regularly accuse the FDA of only looking out for the interest of Big Pharma. Some bureaucrats are innocently stuck in the crossfire.

The government does seem to push the patented synthetic drugs–each with its own unenviable list of horrible side effects–when there are certainly better, less harmful solutions out there. But certainly not all of its officers are corrupt. Let us not lose sight of the fact that  the FDA is charged with no easy task. And let us never be slow to recognize the great work of the few outstanding officials that are legitimately fighting for the health and wellness of all.
(more…)

Posted on

With Chemotherapy, Less is More

Oncologists continue using chemotherapy drugs because of the scientific studies that support their use while alternative health “experts” are screaming the benefits of natural substances that are helpful and less dangerous. After carefully considering the pros and cons of each, it is clear that while small doses of chemo may provide some benefit to some patients, higher cumulative doses should be avoided.

Doctors are scientists that are focused on one thing: using the best tools available whose effectiveness are scientifically proven to improve or lengthen the life of the patient. Naturopaths and other alternative practitioners also attempt to improve and lengthen the patient’s life, but very often relies on common sense, folk traditions, and informally-gathered “anecdotes” that may or may not qualify as legitimate evidence, depending on who you ask.

If you ask me, I say that medicines continue to be handled by doctors, herbs continue to be handled by herbalists, and evidence continue to be handled by lawyers and judges.

Scientists prefer to base their opinion on larger, more formal studies, with strict procedures for comparing the effect of one substance against a fake. In most cases the look-alike is a sugar pill or a saline injection that tricks the patient into believing that she is receiving an active ingredient. To achieve the so-called “gold standard” of scientific studies, the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, even the doctor must be fooled into thinking that she is administering the drug.

No herbalist can afford to conduct such a study. Herbs are in the public domain, available to patients for free or for next to nothing. The herbalist has heard that a particular natural substance will have a beneficial effect based the vitamins or minerals that it contains, or based on the success stories from past users. But these “anecdotes” are considered unscientific.

Where is the truth in all of this?

A wise man that I know taught me to go to great lengths to find the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, no matter how obvious the truth may seem on the surface, and no matter how confusing things get when you dig up heaps of seemingly-disconnected facts. Only the most thoughtful and most patient among us are willing to take the time to carefully examine each scientific study and each “unscientific” anecdote to decide which of these belongs in the final weighing of the evidence.

In a perfect world, there would be wonderful studies comparing the effects of synthetic drugs against the natural alternative. There would be no need for deceiving hard-working, intelligent doctors, no more fooling the innocent and cooperative patients. Less money wasted messing around with sugar and salt.

I admit that it is mildly interesting to see how many patients are healed just by taking a moot pill, since this phenomenon proves that a person’s positive thoughts do in fact have a positive influence on her healing. But this has been proven and re-proved. On to other matters that are yet unclear in the minds of many.

We all want to know exactly how well does the notorious chemotherapy work when compared directly against the mighty dandelion, or raw natural cannabis?

There are heated debates, but rarely does a debate end with both sides having the same view of the truth.

Physicians and alternative practicioners must find some common ground. We must work together, without finger-pointing or name-calling. We must remember that we all want the same thing: to heal the patient, with the best means possible. We must be civil and fair. Each one of us must strive for the extremely-high standard of fairness that a wise judge strives for.

As Lown said in his 1996 book, the Lost art of healing, “Caring without science is well-intentioned kindness, but not medicine.”

The New England Journal of Medicine is a highly-prestigious weekly medical journal that is strictly devoted to science. In its pages you will find the observations and opinions of the most highly-trained professionals in the field of medicine.You will not find a great many studies on natural substances, not because the contributors or the editors are against nature, but simply because this type of study in fact doesn’t exist. But there is no shortage of information on chemotherapy agents, like doxorubicin.

On September 24, 1998, the NEJM published a report by K. Pawan and others, stating that with higher doses of doxorubicin, up to 36 percent of patients suffered cardiomyopathy or congestive heart failure. (“Higher” means a cumulative dose of more than 601 mg/sq m of body surface area.) At a medium dose, the risk was still up to 18 %. The researchers proposed a “dose cap” of 500 mg/sq m of body surface area, which seems to cap the risk of heart attack at “just” 4 %.
Clearly, even those that argue in favour of chemotherapy agree that its use should be minimized to avoid its most dangerous side effects.

In numerous studies, cannabis has been found to have antineoplastic, analgesic, antiemetic and appetite-modulatory properties. And raw cannabis has never been proven to harm a patient. Smoked cannabis does produce unwanted side effects such as undesired psychotropic changes and a slight risk of hypoxemia. But raw cannabis juice poses no such risks and contains the essential nutrients THC-acid and CBD-acid.

According to Dr. William Courtney, the tolerable dose of THCa is 60 times higher than with THC (600mg vs 10mg). The low human tolerance for THC explains why a slight change in dose will take some from a pleasant “high” to an unpleasant “acute toxic effect”. [Gerra G et al. Recent Pat CNS Drug Discov . 2010;5(1):46–52]

Dr. Courtney used a tincture of raw cannabis to treat a “massive…inoperable brain tumor” in an 8-year-old. At 2 months: a dramatic reduction. At 8 months: the tumour had nearly disappeared. Thus the child avoided side effects of chemotherapy/radiation.

Two pre-clinical trials have shown that CBD thwarts breast cancer growth. […the effects of CBD on the reduction of breast cancer cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis”. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 129 (1): 37–47. 2010.] -and- [McAllister SD et al (2007). “Cannabidiol as a novel inhibitor of Id-1 gene expression in aggressive breast cancer cells”. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 6 (11): 2921–7.]

A study at the University of Windsor showed that dandelion tea caused cancer cell apoptosis (cell suicide) in cancer cells.

Cannabis has been well-known and documented for more than 5,000 years. Dandelion has been known for at least a century, and neither plant is known to be dangerous to humans. Yet each of these natural remedies is a long way from gaining the acceptance of the overall community of physicians and healers. Or are they? Hundreds of thousands have been spent thus far showing dandelion’s promise. But several hundred thousand more are needed to complete a “gold standard” study.

to be continued.

Posted on

Robo-Mosquitoes Are a Serious Threat to Human Life

The mosquito is certainly among Earth’s most hated creatures, and for a variety of reasons. The least important of these reasons–its annoying buzz–is enough to summon the first degree murderer in nearly every human. Who among us has the mental fortitude to lie tranquilly in bed without plotting the violent death of a mosquito that lurks in the protected airspace? Aside from the sleep-disturbing sound caused by mosquitoes of both genders, the female mosquito provokes more serious concerns ranging from an itchy allergic reaction to her otherwise-benign probe, to the sometimes-fatal consequence of passing viruses between people. A look at world history will reveal that the mosquito may be more deserving of the title “public enemy #1” than even the most horrendously deranged humans. Since mosquitoes can easily spread diseases like malaria, yellow fever, west nile, and dengue fever, humans have a good reason to take preventative defensive measures. In the past, even the mightiest empires have underestimated and misunderstood the world’s tiniest air force, and with devastating consequences. Today, we must be more intelligent and more strategic than ever. We must learn from our past, and make calculated decisions. And we must always remember that some things are incalculable!

Queen Elizabeth, take note!

Oxitec Ltd. of England has developed a genetically modified mosquito dubbed OX513A that also flies under the aliases “suicide mosquito”, “dead-end bug” and even “Frankenskeeter”.

But G.M. is no joke!

The all-male robo-mosquitoes contain a “lethality gene” that is supposed to ensure the premature demise of the subsequent generation of mosquitoes. If all goes smoothly, the local mosquito population will drop. But that is one enormous “IF”. The half-baked plan contains at minimum, the following gigantic flaws:

  • if the mosquitoes are exposed to the antibiotic tetracycline, the mutant mosquitoes will survive as flying zombies with untold capabilities and subject to an infinite number of future mutations.
  • tetracycline is commonly used by humans and other animals, so it is a practical certainty that some percentage of mosquitoes will be exposed.
  • the plan requires “overwhelming” the native mosquitoes with transgenic ones at a ratio of 10 to 1.
  • the plan targets only the Aedes Aegypti mosquito, and does nothing to prevent other types of mosquitoes from adapting to fill its disease-spreading niche, and both natural and engineered adaptations are likely to result in new  species that are stronger than the present target.
  • according to Camilo Rodriguez-Beltran, a Chilean biosecurity expert that was trained in France, the gene-altered mosquitoes could cross international boundaries, violating international treaties on biosafety. “All consequences that could occur are unforeseen,” Rodriguez said. “It’s been developed very rapidly.”

And very stupidly, I may add. The mosquito is already dangerous enough as it is. Screwing with its genes could prove to be detrimental to human life. Olmedo Carrasquilla, a Panamanian environmental lawyer, said that Panama should educate the public on mosquito control. He asks “Why invest millions in methods and technology when there are no guarantees and when there are rudimentary methods that work?” 120,000 people in South Florida apparently agree. Angry residents temporarily blocked a plan to test Oxitec’s robo-mosquito in the Florida Keys last year. Here’s hoping the plan will be dropped rather than delayed. Oxitec mosquitoes have been tested in the Cayman Islands, Brazil and Malaysia and may soon be  tested in India, Florida and Panama, unless governments can WAKE UP to the imminent dangers in time. Besides the best-known strategy for mosquito prevention of dumping stangnant water to reduce mosquito breeding, there are other strategies. My favorite strategy comes from the Kuna indigenous tribe, which currently resides in the beautiful Caribbean archipelago called San Blas, or Kuna Yala in the Kuna language. The Kunas have survived for thousands of years in jungles, mountains and islands. Their survival depends on a healthy co-existence with nature. The Kunas have developed an advanced and complete system of natural medicine that is known as Tuleina. Tuleina is not well-recorded (yet!) but it contains the knowledge of thousands of beneficial plants, at least one for every known and unknown medical condition. To protect themselves from the pesky mosquito, the Kuna take one cup of herbal tea, which successfully wards off mosquitoes for a month or longer. I have taken this tea only a few times in the past eleven years, and I’ve not had a single mosquito bite in over a decade! And I’ve never had to resort to using (toxic) bug spray, not do I fumigate, nor do I sleep in a net. The mosquitoes simply do not come near me.  Even when sitting outside, surrounded by others that complain about the nasty insects, the tiny predators keep a healthy distance from me. So much so that in the last decade, I’ve scarcely even heard their once-familiar buzz. The lesson to be learned here is that, when confronting a natural problem, it is far better to search for the natural solution, rather than seeking the most complicated, most expensive, and most patentable “solution”, that will eventually reveal itself as the most idiotic, most ridiculous and most dangerous course ever taken.

Posted on

Doctor William DavisDoctor William DavisDocteur William DavisDoctor William Davis

According to Dr. William Davis, a protein in wheat, gliadin, binds to opiate receptors in the brain, causing you to overeat. According to cardiologist Dr. William Davis, it is a perfectly-crafted poison to make you gain weight. No human should consume wheat. Eating wheat causes obesity, diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, cancer, dementia, autism and many other problems. Cut out wheat to lose up to 15 pounds in just 30 days.

Dr. Davis is the author of the book “Wheat Belly” and has recently appeared on the Dr. Oz Show.
Segun el Dr. William Davis, una proteina en el trigo, gliadin, se junta a los receptores de opio en el cerebro, lo que provoca comer mas. Esto significa que el trigo es un veneno perfecto para hacerle engordar. Ningun ser humano debe comer el trigo. El trigo causa obesidad, el diabetes, la hipertension, la enfermedad del corazon, el cancer, la demencia, el autismo y varios otros problemas. Eliminalo para perder 15 libras en solamente 30 dias.

Cardiologista

Dr. William Davis

Dr. William Davis é cardiologista e autor da “barriga de trigo” do livro. Recentemente, ele apareceu no programa Dr. Oz.

Segundo o Dr. Davis, uma proteína do trigo, a gliadina, liga-se a receptores opiáceos do cérebro, fazendo com que você a comer demais. O trigo é um veneno perfeitamente criado para fazer você ganhar peso. Não devem ser humano consumir trigo. Comer trigo obesidade causas, diabetes, hipertensão, doenças cardíacas, câncer, demência, autismo e muitos outros problemas. Corte de trigo a perder até 15 quilos em apenas 30 dias.

Posted on

Doctor Otto Warburg

Cancer’s Cause, Prevention and Cure:

Dr. Otto Warburg’s 1931 Nobel-Prize-Winning Discovery

Dr. Otto Heinrich Warburg, with a double doctorate in chemistry and medicine, won the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1931, and died in Berlin in 1970. Dr. Warburg discovered that cancer is caused by weakened cell respiration due to lack of oxygen at the cellular level. He further proved that cancer thrives in anaerobic (without oxygen), or acidic, conditions. Damaged cell respiration causes fermentation, resulting in low pH (acidity) in the cells. Cancer cells maintain an acidic pH, as low as 6.0, due to lactic acid production and elevated CO2. DR. WARBURG PROVED THAT CANCER CANNOT LIVE IN AN ALKALINE BODY (pH 7.36). Oxygen is directly related to pH. The higher the pH,  the higher the concentration of oxygen molecules.

A normal healthy takes in oxygen to convert glucose into energy. But in the absence of oxygen, the cell must nourish itself by converting glucose through fermentation. This produces lactic acid and lowers the cell pH (making it more acidic) and destroys the ability of DNA and RNA to control cell division. The cancer cells multiply rapidly and do not compensate by dying more rapidly. The lactic acid also causes  local pain as it destroys cell enzymes. Cancerous tumours appear as a rapidly growing external cells covering a core of dead cells.

In his speech “The Prime Cause and Prevention of Cancer“, Dr. Warburg stated that “nobody today can say that one does not know what cancer and its prime cause is. On the contrary, there is no disease whose prime cause is better known, so that today ignorance is no longer an excuse that one cannot do more about prevention.” 

Preventing cancer is better than curing it

Dr. Otto Warburg

La Causa, la Prevencion y la Cura para Cancer: el decubrimiento que gano el Premio Nobel de Medicina en 1931.

Según el Dr. Warburg, el cáncer es la consecuencia de una alimentación antifisiológica y un estilo de vida anti fisiológico

Otto Heinrich Warburg (1883-1970). Premio Nobel 1931 por su tesis la causa primaria y la prevención

En el año 1931 el científico Otto Heinrich Warburg (1883-1970) recibió el premio Nobel por descubrir la causa primaria del cáncer en su tesis “La causa primaria y la prevención del cáncer“. Según el Dr. Warburg, el cáncer es la consecuencia de una alimentación antifisiológica y un estilo de vida antifisiológico.

¿Porqué?

Una alimentación antifisiologica (dieta basada en alimentos acidificantes y sedentarismo), crea en nuestro organismo un entorno de acidez y éste, a su vez, provoca la expulsión del oxígeno de las células. El Dr. Warburg afirmó:

  • “La falta de oxígeno y la acidosis son las dos caras de una misma moneda: cuando usted tiene uno, usted tiene el otro”.
  • “Las substancias ácidas rechazan el oxígeno; en cambio, las substancias alcalinas atraen el oxígeno”.
  • “Privar a una célula de oxígeno durante 48 horas puede convertirla en cancerosa”.
  • “Todas las células normales tienen un requisito absoluto para el oxígeno, pero las células cancerosas pueden vivir sin oxígeno (esta es una regla sin excepción)”.
  • “Los tejidos cancerosos son tejidos ácidos, mientras que los sanos son tejidos alcalinos”.

En su obra “El metabolismo de los tumores“, Warburg demostró que todas las formas de cáncer se caracterizan por dos condiciones básicas: la acidosis y la hipoxia (falta deoxígeno). También descubrió que las células cancerosas son anaerobias (no respiran oxígeno) y no pueden sobrevivir en presencia de altos niveles de oxígeno. En cambio, sobreviven gracias a la glucosa siempre y cuando el entorno este libre de oxígeno.

Por lo tanto, el cáncer no sería nada más que un mecanismo de defensa que tienen ciertas células del organismo para continuar con vida en un entorno ácido y carente de oxígeno. Las células sanas viven en un entorno alcalino y oxigenado, lo cual permite su normal funcionamiento. Una vez finalizado el proceso de la digestión, los alimentos generarán una condición de acidez o alcalinidad al organismo en función de la calidad de las proteínas, los hidratos de carbono, las grasas, los minerales y las vitaminas.

El resultado acidificante o alcalinizante se mide a través de una escala llamada PH, cuyos valores se encuentran en un rango de 0 a 14, siendo el PH 7 un PH neutro. Es importante saber cómo afectan a la salud los alimentos ácidos y alcalinos, ya que para que las células funcionen en forma correcta y adecuada su PH debe ser ligeramente alcalino. En una persona sana el PH de la sangre se encuentra entre 7,40 y 7,45. Tener en cuenta que si el PH sanguíneo cayera por debajo de 7 entraríamos en un estado de coma próximo a la muerte.

De acuerdo con lo expuesto aquí, se pueden generar dos listas de alimentos que acidifican y alcalinizan el organismo:

Alimentos que acidifican el organismo:

  • Azúcar refinada y todos sus productos (el peor de todos: no tiene ni proteínas, ni grasas, ni minerales, ni vitaminas; solo hidratos de carbono refinados que estresan al páncreas. Su PH es de 2,1, es decir, que es altamente acidificante).
  • Carnes (todas).
  • Leche de vaca y todos sus derivados.
  • Sal refinada.
  • Harina refinada y todos sus derivados (pastas, galletitas, etc.).
  • Productos de panadería (la mayoría contienen grasas saturadas, margarina, sal, azúcar y conservantes).
  • Margarinas.
  • Gaseosas.
  • Cafeína.
  • Alcohol.
  • Tabaco.
  • Medicinas.
  • Cualquier alimento cocinado (La cocción elimina el oxigeno y lo trasforma en ácido) inclusive las verduras cocinadas.
  • Todo lo que contenga conservantes, colorantes, aromatizantes, estabilizantes, etc: todos los alimentos envasados.

Constantemente la sangre se encuentra autorregulándose para no caer en acidez metabólica, de esta forma garantiza el buen funcionamiento celular, optimizando el metabolismo. El organismo debería obtener de los alimentos las bases (minerales) para neutralizar la acidez de la sangre de la metabolización, pero todos los alimentos ya citados aportan muy poco y en contrapartida desmineralizan el organismo, sobre todo los refinados. Hay que tener en cuenta que en el estilo de vida moderno estos alimentos se consumen todos los días del año.

Alimentos Alcalinizantes (Saludables y favorables a la vida)

  • Todas las verduras crudas producen una reacción alcalinizante.
  • El limón tiene un PH aproximado de 2.2, pero dentro del organismo tiene un efecto altamente alcalinizante (el más poderoso de todas las frutas).
  • Semillas: aparte de todos sus beneficios, son altamente alcalinizantes, como por ejemplo las almendras.
  • La miel (es altamente alcalinizante).
  • La clorofila de las plantas (de cualquier planta) es altamente alcalinizante (sobre todo el aloe vera).
  • El agua es importantísima para el aporte de oxigeno “La deshidratación crónica es el estresante principal del cuerpo y la raíz de la mayor parte de las enfermedades degenerativas” afirma el Dr. Feydoon Batmanghelidj
  • El ejercicio oxigena todo tu organismo, el sedentarismo lo desgasta.

El Doctor George w. Crile, de Cleverand, uno de los cirujanos más importantes del mundo declara abiertamente: “Todas las muertes mal llamadas naturales no son más que el punto terminal de una saturación de ácidos en el organismo”. Contrario a lo anterior es totalmente imposible que un cáncer prolifere en una persona que libere su cuerpo de la acidez, nutriéndose con alimentos que produzcan reacciones metabólicas alcalinas y aumentando el consumo del agua pura y que, a su vez, evite los alimentos que originan dicha acidez, y se cuide de los elementos tóxicos. En general el cáncer no se contagia ni se hereda…lo que se hereda son las costumbres alimenticias, ambientales y de vida que lo producen.”

Mencken escribió: “La lucha de la vida es en contra de la retención de ácido. El envejecimiento, la falta de energía, el mal genio y los dolores de cabeza, enfermedades del corazón, alergias, eczemas, urticaria, asma, cálculos y arteriosclerosis no son más que la acumulación de ácidos.”

El Dr. Theodore A. Baroody dice en su libro “Alkalize or Die” (alcalinizar o morir): “En realidad no importa el sin número de nombres de enfermedades. Lo que sí importa es que todas provienen de la misma causa básica: muchos desechos ácidos en el cuerpo” .

El Dr. Robert O Young dijo: “El exceso de acidificación en el organismo es la causa de todas las enfermedades degenerativas. Cuando se rompe el equilibrio y el organismo comienza a producir y almacenar más acidez y desechos tóxicos de los que puede eliminar, entonces se manifiestan diversas dolencias.

¿Y la quimioterapia?

La quimioterapia acidifica el organismo a tal extremo, que este debe recurrir a las reservas alcalinas de forma inmediata para neutralizar tanta acidez, sacrificando bases minerales (Calcio, Magnesio, Potasio) depositadas en huesos, dientes, uñas, articulaciones y cabellos. Es por ese motivo que se observa semejante degradación en las personas que reciben este tratamiento, y entre tantas otras cosas, se les cae a gran velocidad el cabello. Para el organismo no significa nada quedarse sin cabello, pero un PH acido significaría la muerte.

Dr. Otto Warburg

Otto Heinrich Warburg

(1883-1970)

De acordo com o Dr. Warburg, o cancro é o resultado de um alimentacao e um estilo de vida anti-fisiológica.

 

Prêmio Nobel 1931 para a sua tese a causa primária ea prevenção

Em 1931, o cientista Otto Heinrich Warburg (1883-1970) recebeu o Prêmio Nobel por descobrir a causa primária de câncer em sua tese “A causa primária ea prevenção do câncer.” De acordo com o Dr. Warburg, o cancro é o resultado do estilo de vida antifisiológico anti-fisiológico e nutricional.

Por quê?

Uma fonte de anti-fisiológica (acidificantes dieta alimentar e inactividade física), cria um ambiente no nosso acidez corpo e este, por sua vez, faz com que a expulsão do oxigénio a partir das células. Dr. Warburg afirmou:

    “A falta de oxigênio e acidose são dois lados da mesma moeda: quando você tem um, você tem o outro.”
    “O oxigénio rejeitar substâncias ácidas, enquanto que substâncias alcalinas atrair oxigénio”.
    “Privar uma célula de oxigênio para 48 horas pode se tornar cancerosas.”
    “Todas as células normais têm uma exigência absoluta de oxigênio, mas as células cancerosas podem viver sem oxigênio (esta é uma regra sem exceção).”
    “Tecidos cancerosos são ácidos tecidos, enquanto que os tecidos normais são alcalinas.”

Em seu livro “O metabolismo dos tumores”, Warburg demonstrou que todas as formas de câncer são caracterizadas por duas condições básicas: a acidose e hipóxia (falta desoxigenado). Também descobriu que as células cancerosas são anaeróbicas (não respire oxigénio) e não podem sobreviver na presença de níveis elevados de oxigénio. Em contraste, a glucose sobreviver enquanto este ambiente isento de oxigénio.

Portanto, o câncer não seria nada mais do que um mecanismo de defesa que tem certas células do corpo para se manter vivo em um ambiente desprovido de oxigênio e ácido. As células saudáveis ​​vivem em um ambiente alcalino e oxigênio, que permite a operação normal. Uma vez que o processo de digestão, os alimentos gerar uma condição ácida ou alcalina no organismo, dependendo da qualidade de proteínas, hidratos de carbono, gorduras, minerais e vitaminas.

Acidificantes ou alcalinizantes O resultado é medido por uma escala chamada pH, cujos valores estão no intervalo de 0 a 14, pH 7 pH ser neutro. É importante saber como afecta a saúde alimentos ácidos e alcalinos, como para as células funcionem adequadamente e de forma adequada, o pH deve ser ligeiramente alcalino. Em uma pessoa saudável, o pH do sangue situa-se entre 7,40 e 7,45. Note que, se o pH do sangue caíram abaixo de 7 entraria em coma perto da morte.

Deste modo aqui descrito, podem gerar duas listas de alimentos e alcalinizou acidificar o corpo:

Os alimentos que acidificam o corpo:

    O açúcar refinado e todos os produtos de todos os piores (não tem proteína, sem gordura, sem minerais, vitaminas, carboidratos refinados apenas que o estresse no pâncreas. Seu PH é 2,1, ou seja, é altamente acidificantes).
    Carne (todos).
    Leite de vaca e todos os seus derivados.
    Sal refinado.
    Farinha refinada e todos os seus derivados (tortas, biscoitos, etc.).
    Produtos de padaria (a maioria contêm gorduras saturadas, margarina, sal, açúcar e conservantes).
    Margarinas.
    Soft.
    Cafeína.
    Álcool.
    Rapé.
    Medicamentos.
    Qualquer alimento cozido (Cozinhar elimina oxigênio e transformada em ácido), incluindo legumes cozidos.
    Tudo o que contém conservantes, corantes, aromatizantes, estabilizantes, etc: todos os alimentos embalados.

Constantemente autorregulándose sangue não está a cair em acidose metabólica, assegurando assim o bom funcionamento das células, optimizando o metabolismo. O organismo deve obter bases alimentares (minerais) para neutralizar a acidez do sangue do metabolismo, mas, acima de todos os alimentos e contribui muito pouco e em troca desmineralizar corpo, especialmente refinado. Tenha em mente que o estilo de vida moderno estes alimentos são consumidos todos os dias do ano.

Alimentos alcalinizantes (saudável e favorável à vida)

    Todos os vegetais crus alcalinizantes produzir uma reação.
    O limão tem um pH de cerca de 2,2, mas em que o corpo tem um efeito altamente alcalinizantes (o mais potente de todos os frutos).
    Sementes: além de todos os seus benefícios, são altamente alcalinizantes, como amêndoas.
    Mel (altamente alcalinizantes).
    A clorofila em plantas (de qualquer planta) é altamente alcalinizante (especialmente vera aloe).
    A água é importante para o fornecimento de oxigênio “desidratação crônica é o principal órgão estressante e raiz da maioria das doenças degenerativas”, disse o Dr. Batmanghelidj Feydoon
    Exercício oxigena seu corpo inteiro, ele usa um estilo de vida sedentário.

Dr. George w. Crile, de Cleverand, um dos cirurgiões mais importantes do mundo declara abertamente: “Todas as mortes naturais misnamed são apenas o ponto final de uma saturação de ácidos no organismo.” Ao contrário do que o que precede é totalmente impossível para um cancro crescem no corpo de uma pessoa, para libertar a sua acidez, a produção de alimentos, alimentados com alcalinas reacções metabólicas e aumento do consumo de água pura, e que, por sua vez, evitar os alimentos que causam tais acidez, e cuidar dos elementos tóxicos. Câncer em geral não é contagiosa nem hereditária herdou … quais são os hábitos alimentares, ambientais e de vida que produzi-lo. “

Mencken escreveu: “A luta da vida é contra a retenção de ácido. O envelhecimento, a falta de paciência de energia, mau e dores de cabeça, doenças do coração, alergias, eczema, urticária, asma, rins e arteriosclerose são apenas a acumulação de ácidos. “

Dr. Theodore A. Baroody diz em seu livro “Alkalize or Die” (alcalinizar ou morrer): “Não importa os nomes incontáveis ​​das doenças O que importa é que todos eles vêm da causa raiz mesmo:. Muitos resíduos ácidos no corpo” .

O Dr. Robert Young disse: “O excesso de acidificação no organismo é a causa de todas as doenças degenerativas. Quando o equilíbrio é perturbado eo corpo começa a produzir e armazenar mais acidez e lixo tóxico que pode ser eliminado, então se manifestar de várias doenças.

 

E sobre a quimioterapia?

Quimioterapia acidifica o corpo, de tal forma que ela deve basear-se reservas imediatamente alcalinas para neutralizar a acidez tal, sacrificando minerais de bases (cálcio, magnésio, potássio) depositadas em ossos, dentes, unhas e cabelo, das articulações. É por isso que uma tal degradação é observada em pessoas que recebem este tratamento, e entre muitas outras coisas, eles deixam de lado o cabelo de alta velocidade. Para o corpo não significa nada perder cabelo, mas um pH ácido significar a morte.

Posted on

Dr. Omar Moreno: Dairy Linked to Degenerative DiseasesDr. Omar Moreno: Lacteos Relacionados con Enfermedades DegenerativasDr. Omar Moreno: Le lait lié aux maladies dégénérativesDr. Omar Moreno: Leite ligado a doenças degenerativasМолоко Связанный с дегенеративных заболеваний Dr Omar Moreno: Qumësht E lidhur me sëmundjet degjenerative退行性疾病联系到牛奶

DAIRY LINKED TO DEGENERATIVE DISEASES

Dairy is linked with breast cancer, ovarian cancer and prostate cancer, obesity, allergies, osteoporosis and digestive problems. Dairy damages the arteries, causing varicose veins and contributing to the clogging of the coronary arteries. DEAR System Iridology can reveal if there is risk of damage to the coronary arteries over time. Consume calcium with good bio-availability,  such as from vegetables and appropriate supplements. Doctor Integral Ltda provides high quality calcium supplements.

Greetings and blessings

Dr. Omar Moreno ND-DSNM

LACTEOS RELACIONADOS CON ENFERMEDADES DEGENERATIVAS

Lacteos relacionados con cancer de seno, ovarios y próstata, obesidad, alergias, osteoporosis y problemas digestivos. Los lacteos dañan las arterias, causando varices y contribuyendo con el taponamiento de las arterias coronarias. La iridología de Sistema DEAR puede revelar si existe riesgo de daños a las arterias coronarias a largo plazo. Prefiera consumir calcio de buena biodisponibilidad como el de los vegetales y suplementos adecuado.  Doctor Integral Ltda ofrece suplementos de calcio de alta calidad. Para ver el articulo completo sobre los lacteos y los daños a la salud, visite http://spa.dearsys.com/Biblioteca/Noticias/lacteos_perjudiciales.pdf

Tabla explicatoria de Medicina Natural de Sistema DEAR http://spa.dearsys.com/Biblioteca/

 

Saludos y bendiciones

Dr. Omar Moreno ND-DSNM

Centro Integral Dr. Omar Moreno

Tel 396-1785

Cel 6633-1293

Posted on

Coconut Oil May Cure or Prevent Alzheimer’s, Parkinsons, Epilepsy, Schizophrenia and AutismAceite de Coco Puede Curar o Prevenir Las Enfermedades de Alzheimer y Parkinson, La Epilepsia, La Esquizofrenia y El Autismo

Alzheimer’s is a kind of “diabetes of the brain” where insulin prevents the brain cells from receiving the glucose that they need. Without fuel, the brain cells die. Keytones are an alternative fuel that is easily accepted into the brain cells. Keytones are metabolised by the liver after eating medium-chain fatty acids found in coconut oil. Coconut oil is the healthiest oil available, as it raises your HDL (good) cholesterol and unlike almost any other oil, it remains intact under the high heat of your frying pan.

La enfermedad de Alzheimer es una variedad de “diabetes del cerebro” donde la insulina previene a las celulas cerebrales de recibir la glucosa que necesitan. Sin combustible, las celulas cerebrales mueren. Los keytones son un combustible alternativo que es facilmente recibido en las celulas cerebrales. Los keytones son producidos por el higado despues de comer grasas de cadena medianas, las cuales se encuentra en el aceite de coco. El aceite de coco es el aceite mas saludable porque sube su nivel de colesterol HDL (el beneficioso) y a contrario de casi todos los aceites, no se convierte en toxina cuando se expone a las altas temperaturas de la coccion.